Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 1998 1(4):523-536; doi:10.1093/jiel/1.4.523
© 1998 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otten, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Implementation of the TRIPS agreement and prospects for its further development

A Otten

Director of the Intellectual Property and Investment Division, WTO Secretariat, 154 Rue de Lausanne, Geneva 21, Switzerland

WTO Members can look back on the first three and a half years of the TRIPS Agreement with some satisfaction. Implementation by developed countries has been broadly satisfactory, although not without its gaps and delays. The TRIPS Council has developed and run-in important mechanisms for monitoring compliance. The dispute settlement mechanism has, in general, worked well and has already yielded positive results in the TRIPS area. A huge amount has been done by developing countries in anticipation of the end of their transition periods. Cooperation with WIPO has been established and is going well. Some useful work has been done on the built-in agenda.

However, the principal challenges probably remain for the future. Much still has to be done by developing countries to bring themselves into compliance. The mechanisms of the WTO, in particular the TRIPS Council and the dispute settlement system, have to show that they have the capacity to deal with compliance issues arising from implementation by more than 130 Members as opposed to the 30 plus countries so far. As for the further development of the Agreement, the coming period leading to the possible launching of broad-based negotiations, in the WTO at the end of 1999 will be a critical period for reflection and consensus-building on the way in which the TRIPS Agreement should evolve in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
A. Lanoszka
The Global Politics of Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceutical Drug Policies in Developing Countries
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, April 1, 2003; 24(2): 181 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.