Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2000 3(3):507-523; doi:10.1093/jiel/3.3.507
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lastra, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The international monetary fund in historical perspective

RM Lastra

Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK E-mail: r.lastra@qmw.ac.uk

The International Monetary Fund was set up in 1944 in a context of war, with the memories of hyperinflation, depression, and fluctuating exchange rates still fresh. The institution - though never exempt from criticism - has arguably served the international community well over the years, demonstrating a tremendous ability to adjust to new economic circumstances. Despite the abandonment of the par value regime in the 1970s, the importance of the IMF has remained undiminished. The IMF played a leading role in the sovereign debt restructuring of the LDC countries in the 1980s, in the transition to a market economy of formerly communist countries in the early 1990s, and in the resolution of financial crises in Mexico and Asia in the mid- to late 1990s, though its handling of such crises has been the subject of much controversy. This paper provides a historical primer on the IMF and considers some of the challenges the institution faces as we enter the twenty-first century. In particular, it questions the wisdom of granting the IMF a formal international lender of last resort role; it suggests that surveillance be extended beyond macro-economic policies to [micro] prudential financial supervision; and surveys the evolution and 'relaxation' of conditionality over the years.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.