Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2001 4(3):527-555; doi:10.1093/jiel/4.3.527
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vermulst, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mihaylova, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

EC Commercial Defence Actions against Textiles from 1995 to 2000:

Possible Lessons for Future Negotiations

Edwin Vermulst1 and Polya Mihaylova1

1 Brussels, Belgium. Email: edwin.vermulst{at}vwv-law.be

This article explores, on the basis of a case study of anti-dumping and countervailing duty actions taken by the European Union against textiles products from 1995 to 2000, whether proposed changes to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement and the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in the period immediately preceding the Seattle Ministerial would have a significant effect in practice, particularly to the benefit of developing countries. The article concludes that this would not necessarily be the case, and offers additional suggestions for amendments that would affect almost all cases.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.