Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2003 6(1):23-47; doi:10.1093/jiel/6.1.23
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nottage, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Trade and Competition in the WTO: Pondering the Applicability of Special and Differential Treatment

Hunter Nottage1

1 Advisory Centre on WTO Law, Geneva, Switzerland. e-mail: hunter.nottage{at}acwl.ch

This article critically evaluates the potential applicability of special and differential treatment (‘S&D’) as a mechanism for addressing development concerns often associated with a possible WTO agreement on trade and competition policy. It begins by examining the origins, evolution, and current S&D provisions in the GATT and WTO. It then addresses S&D in a trade and competition context, by first evaluating its broad relevance and then exploring a number of options to formulate the concept in order to most effectively advance development objectives in this nascent area. While the article advocates that S&D could play a valuable role in addressing the special challenges faced by developing countries at this policy interface, it highlights where opinions differ, or empirical evidence is lacking, on the true developmental value of the various options explored. This is particularly the case concerning exceptions and exemptions, to competition regimes, the role of transitional time periods, and the optimal phasing in of competition policy. Thus the article argues that in a trade and competition policy context S&D is not a panacea, and cautions against S&D being used to delay or exempt the introduction of competition disciplines, where such disciplines would be of benefit to developing countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.