Skip Navigation


Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2006
Journal of International Economic Law 2006 9(4):989-1016; doi:10.1093/jiel/jgl028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/4/989    most recent
jgl028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nottage, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sebastian, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of International Economic Law Vol. 9 No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2006, all rights reserved

Giving Legal Effect to the Results of WTO Trade Negotiations: An Analysis of the Methods of Changing WTO Law

Hunter Nottage and Thomas Sebastian*

* Both Counsel at the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: hunter.nottage{at}acwl.ch; thomas.sebastian{at}acwl.ch.


  Abstract

Trade negotiations conducted in the World Trade Organization (WTO) offer the significant benefit that their results can be made legally binding and enforceable through an effective dispute settlement system. If negotiators wish to avail of this benefit, they must follow the correct procedures to give legal effect to their work. This article critically evaluates the main methods of converting the results of WTO trade negotiations, with a particular focus on the ongoing Doha Round, into WTO law. It demonstrates that amendments to the WTO agreements are procedurally cumbersome and have significant limitations. The article therefore analyses several alternative methods including modifications to schedules, decisions of the Ministerial Conference (such as waivers, authoritative interpretations, and Other Decisions), and the incorporation of new agreements into WTO law (whether multilateral, plurilateral, or reference rules accepted through schedules). The choice between these various methods is complicated as each has advantages and disadvantages. By comparing and evaluating the available options, this article aims to assist negotiators and lawyers in making that difficult choice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.