Skip Navigation


Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access originally published online on November 14, 2005
Journal of International Economic Law 2005 8(4):861-890; doi:10.1093/jiel/jgi049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/4/861    most recent
jgi049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bown, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hoekman, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of International Economic Law Vol. 8 No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2005, all rights reserved

WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector

Chad P. Bown* and Bernard M. Hoekman**

* Associate Professor, Department of Economics and International Business School, MS 021, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454–9110 USA, tel: 781–736–4823, fax: 781–736–2269, email:cbown{at}brandeis.edu, web: http://www.brandeis.edu/~cbown/.
** Research Manager, Development Research Group, The World Bank, 1818 H St, NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA, tel: 202–473–1185. E-mail: bhoekman{at}worldbank.org.

The poorest WTO member countries almost universally fail to engage as either complainants or interested third parties in formal dispute settlement activity related to their market access interests. This paper focuses on costs of the WTO’s extended litigation process as an explanation for the potential but ‘missing’ developing country engagement. We provide a positive examination of the current system, and we catalogue and analyze a set of proposals encouraging the private sector to provide DSU-specific legal assistance to poor countries. We investigate the role of legal service centres, non-governmental organizations, development organizations, international trade litigators, economists, consumer organizations, and law schools to provide poor countries with the services needed at critical stages of the WTO’s extended litigation process. In the absence of systemic rules reform, the public-private partnership model imposes a substantial cooperation burden on such groups as they organize export interests, estimate the size of improved market access payoffs, prioritize across potential cases, engage domestic governments, prepare legal briefs, assist in evidentiary discovery, and pursue the public relations effort required to induce foreign political compliance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International SociologyHome page
N. Chorev
Fixing Globalization Institutionally: US Domestic Politics of International Trade
International Sociology, January 1, 2010; 25(1): 54 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.