Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2007
Journal of International Economic Law 2007 10(3):461-481; doi:10.1093/jiel/jgm022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2007, all rights reserved
Global Justice and the Bretton Woods Institutions
*Professor, Boston College Law School, 885 Centre St, Newton, Mass.02459 USA. E-mail: frank.garcia.1{at}bc.edu, garciafr{at}bc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
Together with the WTO, the Bretton Woods Institutions are the preeminent international institutions devoted to managing international economic relations. This mandate puts them squarely in the center of the debate concerning development, inequality and global justice. This essay explores how justice criteria might apply to the ideology and operations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Using the Rawlsian model of egalitarian justice adapted to international institutions by the author in connection with the WTO, this essay asks what difference it would make for the Bank and Fund if an explicit justice framework informed their international lending activities.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. D. Kinney Realization of the International Human Right to Health in an Economically Integrated North America J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2009; 37(4): 807 - 818. [PDF] |
||||
