Skip Navigation


Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2008
Journal of International Economic Law 2008 11(3):575-608; doi:10.1093/jiel/jgn022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/3/575    most recent
jgn022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hannah, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2008, all rights reserved

Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space

Steven Bernstein* and Erin Hannah**

* Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto. 100 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario. M5S 3G3. E-mail: steven.bernstein{at}utoronto.ca
** Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario. M5S 3G3. E-mail: erin.hannah{at}utoronto.ca


  Abstract

The proliferation of transnational social and environmental standards developed by non-state governance systems potentially poses a challenge to international trade law and the legitimacy of the World Trade Organization (WTO). These systems—in areas including forestry, apparel, tourism, labour practices, agriculture, fisheries, and food—operate largely independently of states as well as of traditional standard setting bodies such as the International Organization for Standardization. In lieu of definitive legal rules on recognition of legitimate international standards under relevant trade agreements [e.g, Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)], we identify the legal and political dynamics of standards recognition and find good prospects for these new non-state governance systems to successfully navigate them. Since these systems’ standards ultimately aim to socially embed global markets, the WTO's legitimacy is at risk if its rules open the door to legal challenges of states that implicitly or explicitly adopt them. To avoid such legitimacy problems, we propose that a norm of leaving ‘transnational regulatory space’ for social and environmental standard setting should guide the WTO and its members.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.