Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 1998 1(4):690-694; doi:10.1093/jiel/1.4.690
© 1998 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carmody, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Customs Tariff S. 59(2): a 'Canadian 301'?

C Carmody

Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA

It is sometimes said that every country has a S. 301, and Canada is no exception. Section 59(2) of Canada's Customs Tariff allows the Canadian government to take a broad range of measures against foreign goods and services in order to enforce Canada's rights under a trade agreement or to counter discriminatory foreign practices with an adverse effect on Canada's trade. The provision is clearly retaliatory in nature. Here, however, the similarities with S. 301 end. Canada's unilateral trade remedy may indeed by 301-like, but the conditions under which it exists are fundamentally distinct. A comparison of the two statutes helps to illustrate the difference. At the same time Canada has never seen unilateral retaliation as particularly useful, so that any discussion of S. 59(2) and its related legislation must concentrate more on theory than reality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.