Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2000 3(4):655-690; doi:10.1093/jiel/3.4.655
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kong, Q
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

China's WTO accession: commitments and implications

Q Kong

Hangzhou Institute of Commerce E-mail: kongqi@mail.hz.zj.cn

One hundred years after its adoption, China's Open Door policy is bearing fruit: China has concluded expansive market access agreements with its major trading partners that have paved the way for its becoming a Member of the World Trading Community. As a necessary cost of the WTO accession, China has made remarkable commitments, particularly in relation to its current trade practice. These commitments raise the question of whether China will be able to surpass the formidable barriers of implementation in order to become an honourable Member of the World Trading Community. In an effort to provide some answers in this regard, this article examines the process of China's WTO accession process, and the positive links between China's internal reform and its external economic integration. The focus of the analysis is on measuring the gap between China's commitments for WTO membership and its current practice. The article further assesses the factors that affect the implementation of China's commitments, i.e. its law concerning international agreements, the inherent domestic constraints, and the outside monitoring. The analysis allows the tentative conclusion that the internal drive for openness evidenced in recent practice, and the outside monitoring assisted with persuasion will outweigh the negative historical context.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
G. Yeung and V. Mok
Does WTO accession matter for the Chinese textile and clothing industry?
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2004; 28(6): 937 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.