Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2001 4(1):111-130; doi:10.1093/jiel/4.1.111
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilf, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Power, rules and principles - which orientation for WTO/GATT law?

M Hilf

Department of European Law, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany

Are principles just 'phony concepts' or the very heart of every legal system? The purpose of this article is to inquire to what extent one might describe the WTO system as having triple-jumped from a power-oriented system to a rule-based system and finally to a principle-oriented system. This comparison should not be taken literally. Of course, there have not been 'jumps'. In reality there has been a continuing process in which power, rules, and principles evolved gradually. What are these principles, which also were referred to in the Preamble of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization as basic principles underlying the multilateral trading system? This article searches Appellate Body reports in an effort to identify the use of principles. It first looks at eight 'internal' principles, e.g. trade liberalization, non-discrimination, sovereignty, and sustainable development, derived from WTO Agreements and focuses then on 'external' principles derived from public international law. Finally, the article discusses the proper role and ranking of principles in the WTO legal system and suggests that these should be balanced by using the principle of proportionality as applied by the International Court of Justice or extensively by the European Court of Justice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.