Skip Navigation

Journal of International Economic Law 2003 6(1):237-250; doi:10.1093/jiel/6.1.237
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersmann, E.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

WTO Negotiators Meet Academics

The Negotiations on Improvements of the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann1

1 The European University Institute and its Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in Florence, Italy

On 13–14 September 2002, the European University Institute in Florence sponsored – thanks to the financial support from British Petroleum (BP) – an international workshop on the current negotiations in the World Trade Organization (WTO) on improvements and clarifications of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). The negotiating proposals submitted so far to the DSB in Special Session can be grouped into eight different categories. This short conference report, written by the workshop organizer, begins with a brief introduction to the importance of the law of international organizations for improving the political and legal methods for the international prevention and settlement of disputes. Subsequently, the report summarizes the arguments made during the discussions on the various negotiating proposals, yet without summarizing the eight published conference reports and without disclosing the identity of WTO negotiators in order to respect the fact that their statements were made on a personal basis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.