Skip Navigation



Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access published online on January 27, 2007

Journal of International Economic Law, doi:10.1093/jiel/jgl040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/1/51    most recent
jgl040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Chazournes, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007, all rights reserved

Collective Security and the Economic Interventionism of the UN—the need for a coherent and Integrated Approach

Laurence Boisson de Chazournes*

Correspondence: *Professor and Head of the Department of Public International Law and International Organization, Faculty of Law, University of Geneva. E-mail: Laurence.BoissonDeChazournes{at}droit.unige.ch. The author would like to thank Théo Boutruche, Researcher in the same Department, for his invaluable help in the preparation of this contribution.


   Abstract

The scope of the collective security system established under the United Nations Charter has expanded significantly since the end of the cold war to cover new fields. An increasing linkage between maintenance of peace and economic reconstruction has lead the United Nations to play an unprecedented role within the economic realm, be it by the widening of the range of measures adopted by the Security Council under Chapter VII of the Charter with economic consequences or through the direct management of economies in post-conflict situations as part of a global strategy to restore peace in war-torn territories. This evolution has brought to light the limits of the existing UN collective security system as a framework to deal with economic issues. It is submitted that the ‘derogatory’ logic under Article 103 of the Charter and under WTO law through its exception clauses is no longer sufficient to review and assess the UN action in the economic sphere. The promotion and integration of a broader set of principles and rules of international economic law such as principles of fair competition, non-discrimination, or transparency, would help enhance the legitimacy of actions of the UN Security Council. Moreover, this article argues that taking into account international economic law would contribute to achieve UN goals in post conflict situations by paving the way for a stable and safe economic environment in a long-term perspective. The recently established Peacebuilding Commission may contribute to develop a coherent and integrated legal approach in this area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.