Skip Navigation



Journal of International Economic Law Advance Access published online on September 21, 2007

Journal of International Economic Law, doi:10.1093/jiel/jgm034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/4/887    most recent
jgm034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ping, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007, all rights reserved

Coverage of the WTO's Agreement on Government Procurement: Challenges of Integrating China and other Countries with a Large State Sector into the Global Trading System

Wang Ping*

* Dr Ping Wang Achilles Lecturer in Chinese Law and Public Procurement, Deputy Director of Public Procurement Research Group, School of Law & School of Contemporary Chinese Studies, the University of Nottingham, UK, NG7 2RD, Tel: +44 115 8468163; Email: ping.wang{at}nottingham.ac.uk.


   Abstract

The WTO's plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) is a significant WTO instrument to develop disciplines regulating government procurement. A recent major review of the GPA has led to a revised text, likely to enter into force in 2007. In the meanwhile, China, a country with a large state sector, has promised to initiate GPA accession negotiations by the end of 2007.

The article provides a critical assessment of the extent to which the recent review of the coverage of the GPA has appreciated the characteristics of the government procurement regime of those countries with a large state sector. It is argued that the lack of a principled approach to entity coverage and the ambiguities surrounding the scope of covered procurement are likely to substantially hinder the negotiating process and prevent the optimal outcome of accession negotiations. It is suggested that a formula consisting of basic factors defining the coverage of government procurement disciplines, such as government control and competition, should be employed to address this issue.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.